Define “Burden of Proof”? On whom burden of Proof lies, in both Civil and Criminal Cases?


Define “Burden of Proof”? On whom burden of Proof lies, in both Civil and Criminal Cases?

Ans: The “Burden of Proof “ is defined under Section 101 of the Indian Evidence Act 1872, the burden of proof is called ‘Onus Probandi’. In other words the burden of proof is nothing but introduction of evidence. Where a dispute arises, when on party to legal proceeding asserts or claim something and another party denies it. Where a party desires the Court to give judgment in favor of his legal liability, the responsibility of producing the evidence in Court is called burden of proof. It plays a very important role for the parties. Section 101 to 105 provides for rules, which decide the burden of proof.
The phrase burden of proof is used in two senses:
1.      Burden of Proving all the facts relied upon in support of the case.
2.      Burden of proving evidence in the beginning or at any stage of the case.
Section 101: Burden of Proof:- Whoever wants any Court to give judgment as to any lawful right or obligation subject to the presence of certainties which he declares, must demonstrate that those facts exists.
At the point when an individual will undoubtedly demonstrate the presence of any reality it is said that the weight of confirmation lies on that individual.

Example- ‘A’ pleads that ‘B’ shall be punished for crimes, which ‘B’ has committed. ‘A’ must prove that ‘B’ has committed the crimes.

Illustrations:
a)      'A' wants a Court to give judgment that 'B' will be rebuffed for violations which 'A' says 'B' has submitted.
A must prove that ‘B’ has committed the crimes.
b)      A craving a Court to give judgment that he is qualified for certain land in the ownership of B, by reason of actualities which he affirms, and which B denies, to be true.
A must prove the existence of those facts.
                               
Section 102: On whom burden of proof lies:- The weight of verification lies on that individual who might come up short if no proof is given on either side. This rule is known as the he who file must prove rule.

Example:- ‘A’ sues ‘B’ for money due on a bond. ‘B’ says that bond obtained by fraud. The burden of proof is on ‘B’.

Illustration:-
a)      A sues B for land of which B is in possession, and which as A assets, was left to A by the will of C, B’s father.
On the off chance that no proof were given on either side, B would be qualified for hold his ownership. Therefore the burden of proof is on A.
A sues B for cash due on a bond.
The execution of the bond is conceded, however B says that it was gotten by extortion, which A denies. If no evidence were given on either side. A would prevail as the bond isn't questioned and the extortion isn't demonstrated.
Therefore the burden of proof is on B.

On whom burden of proof lies
The burden of proof lies upon the party whose case would fail if no evidence were given on either side. If A sues B to recover damages for breach of contract and if neither party gives evidence, A would lose his case. Therefore, burden lies upon A to prove that there was a contract between him and B which B has broken. If B admits the contracts, but says that his consent, was caused by fraud and if neither party gives evidence B’s case would fail and therefore, burden lies upon B to prove the fraud.

Burden of Proof in a Civil Lawsuit:-

When a person file a Civil Lawsuit against someone else the burden of proof rest on his shoulder.  At the point when the gatherings go to Court, they each have a chance to recount their side of the story. If that was needed, nearly every case would end in a situation. The person who suffer the loss or damages is called the plaintiff must have right to file a lawsuit in the Court and the other party who he caused harm or damages the property is called defendant or respondent.
The standard to which the plaintiff must prove his case in a civil lawsuit is different from the standard of proof required in a criminal case. In a civil case it need only be prove fact. Which means that it is more likely than not that the defendant action caused the plaintiff damages. There are a few kinds of common cases that are viewed as increasingly genuine. This case must be proven by clear and convincing evidence presented against the defendant must have high probability of being true.

Burden of Proof in a Criminal Cases:-
In a Criminal case, the accused person is by law assumes innocent until the prosecution proves that he is guilty. The burden of proof in a Criminal cases rest on the prosecution, with no requirement that the defendant prove that he is innocent. The standard to which the prosecution must prove the defendant guilt is much higher than in a civil case as the defendant freedom is often at risk In a criminal issue, the arraignment must demonstrate past a sensible uncertainty, that the respondent did the deed. There are some few general exception to this rule in which a defendant can take action in proving his innocence. If the defendant proves that he is not guilty by reason of insanity, drunkenness the burden of proof rest on him that he was insane at the time of the crimes.






Previous
Next Post »